CVE-2009-2940: PyGreSQL Might Be Vulnerable to Encoding-Based SQL Injection
(updated )
PyGreSQL 3.8 did not use PostgreSQL’s safe string and bytea functions in its own escaping functions. As a result, applications written to use PyGreSQL’s escaping functions are vulnerable to SQL injections when processing certain multi-byte character sequences. Because the safe functions require a database connection, to maintain backwards compatibility, pg.escape_string() and pg.escape_bytea() are still available, but applications will have to be adjusted to use the new pyobj.escape_string() and pyobj.escape_bytea() functions. For example, code containing:
import pg
connection = pg.connect(...)
escaped = pg.escape_string(untrusted_input)
should be adjusted to use:
import pg
connection = pg.connect(...)
escaped = connection.escape_string(untrusted_input)
References
- github.com/PyGreSQL/PyGreSQL/commit/8e19320b130946eed6f043297e3e4e005a523612
- github.com/PyGreSQL/PyGreSQL/commit/f7237d773e6f4d5a7da3d99bb6bc5062bd07935e
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-xv6x-43gq-4hfj
- github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/pygresql/PYSEC-2009-18.yaml
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2940
Code Behaviors & Features
Detect and mitigate CVE-2009-2940 with GitLab Dependency Scanning
Secure your software supply chain by verifying that all open source dependencies used in your projects contain no disclosed vulnerabilities. Dependency Scanning using SBOM also detects vulnerabilities from proprietary advisories that this site does not include. Learn more about Dependency Scanning using SBOM →